Legislature(2019 - 2020)
2020-03-21 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2020-03-21 House Journal Page 2011 SB 172 Representative Johnston, Co-chair of the Finance Committee, moved and asked unanimous consent to waive the five-day notice requirement in Uniform Rule 23(a) so the Finance Committee can hear the following on March 22 at 10:00 a.m.: CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 172(L&C) "An Act extending the termination date of the State Medical Board; requiring a report on the State Medical Board's audit compliance; and providing for an effective date." There was objection. Representative Pruitt moved and asked unanimous consent to divide the question to separate SB 172 from the motion. The question being: "Shall SB 172 be separated?" The roll was taken with the following result: SB 52, SB 55, SB 134, SB 155, SB 172 Waive Uniform Rule 23(a) Separate SB 172 YEAS: 15 NAYS: 17 EXCUSED: 6 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Eastman, Gillis, Johnson, Prax, Pruitt, Shaw, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Ortiz, Spohnholz, Story, Zulkosky 2020-03-21 House Journal Page 2012 Excused: Jackson, Lincoln, Merrick, Neuman, Rasmussen, Rauscher Absent: Carpenter, LeDoux And so, the motion failed. Representative Wool moved and asked unanimous consent to divide the question to separate SB 52 from the motion. The question being: "Shall SB 52 be separated?" The roll was taken with the following result: SB 52, SB 55, SB 134, SB 155, SB 172 Waive Uniform Rule 23(a) Separate SB 52 YEAS: 17 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 6 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Eastman, Gillis, Hopkins, Johnson, Knopp, LeBon, Prax, Pruitt, Shaw, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Johnston, Josephson, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Spohnholz, Story, Tarr, Zulkosky Excused: Jackson, Lincoln, Merrick, Neuman, Rasmussen, Rauscher Absent: Carpenter, LeDoux And so, the motion passed. The question being: "Shall Uniform Rule 23(a) be waived on SB 55, SB 134, SB 155, SB 172?" The roll was taken with the following result: SB 55, SB 134, SB 155, SB 172 Waive Uniform Rule 23(a) YEAS: 22 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 6 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Ortiz, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky 2020-03-21 House Journal Page 2013 Nays: Eastman, Gillis, Johnson, Prax, Pruitt, Shaw, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tilton, Vance Excused: Jackson, Lincoln, Merrick, Neuman, Rasmussen, Rauscher Absent: Carpenter, LeDoux And so, lacking the required 27 votes to schedule a new meeting, the motion failed. Representative Johnston moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw the previous motion. There being no objection, it was so ordered.